The Vikings who besieged Paris had no single king because their society was radically decentralized and meritocratic — leadership was earned through proven victory in battle, not inherited or centrally assigned.
Brownworth describes how a Frankish ambassador asking a Viking 'who is your king' got the answer 'we have no king, we are all kings' — illustrating the Vikings' decentralized, merit-based leadership structure. ✦ AI generated
Lars Brownworth · Lex Fridman · 2026-04-09 · original ↗
starts at this moment · 36:13
“Who was the, what was in this Great Heathen Army that invaded England in 865? What can we say about that?”
And so his ambassador went to a Viking and said, "Who is your king?" And the Viking looked at him, he didn't understand, and he said, "We have no king. We are all kings." So they're very like decentralized, tough. They only valued leaders who could prove that they had won.
verbatim transcript · starts at 36:13
36:13And so his ambassador went to a Viking and said, "Who is your king?" And the Viking looked at him, he didn't understand, and he said, "We have no king. We are all kings." So they're very like decentralized, tough. They only valued leaders who could prove that they had, they had won. You know, could give out the rings. - So flat organization, very meritocratic. - Yes. - If you're good at what you do, you demonstrate that skill in
36:40battle. That means you get to have maybe a leadership position. - That's right. - And the moment you're no longer effective, you don't get to have this leadership position. We're all kings. That's gangster. Throughout history, the Mongols, Genghis Khan was famous for this meritocracy. - That's right. Yeah. - That's one of the components of an extremely effective military force is if meritocracy is prized. Same is true for who
37:09gets to rule. How do you determine the succession? If you're just giving it to your oldest son, that's gonna be a problem. - Yeah. Yeah, that... I could not agree more. There are some problems with, with meritocracy in civil war because it tends to... The only way you can find out, like Alexander the Great, right? Who does your empire belong to? To the strongest. That kind of guarantees the civil war. At least with giving it to your older son,
37:34you know who's gonna be... There's an element of stability there although you may end up with a Caligula. More likely than not, you're gonna end up with a Caligula, I would say, human nature being what it is. - It's— It's... Yeah, yeah, it always converges to the asshole, and the asshole holds power, a crazy asshole. Uh, so yeah, Great Heathen Army, 865. - So the Great Heathen Army, they were war bands that... Each followed this guy and
38:02this guy. "And I'm gonna sit you down in this room. I'm gonna tell you my plan. You're gonna listen or you're gonna push back. I'm gonna push back, and we'll just have this kind of creative discussion and come up with a plan we all agree on." - So it used to be relatively small Viking groups that were doing raids. And then the Great Heathen Army is this large coalition of Viking groups-
- ·Frankish ambassador asked a Viking who his king was
- ·Viking replied Vikings had no single king
- ·Society was radically decentralized, not centrally ruled
- ·Leaders valued only if they proved victory in battle
- ·No inherited titles or centrally assigned rulers
- ·Merit in combat was the sole path to authority