ATRIUMsearch → argument graph
ClaimVideo · 7:02 — 11:35

Americans should be able to criticize the founding fathers — learning more about history reveals nuance and mistakes, but questioning them doesn't mean renouncing the American experiment; it means being honest about it.

Conan argues that self-criticism is in the American spirit, and that learning more about the founders' flaws is part of an honest engagement with history — it doesn't mean rejecting the country. ✦ AI generated

Conan O'Brien · The Rest Is History · 2026-07-25 · original ↗

starts at this moment · 7:02

I admire any country or populace that is self-critical. That is one of my favorite qualities. And I do think there's a notion sometimes these days in the United States and we've had it before in the late 60s and early 70s that to love America you have to love everything about it and if you have any qualms at all you should leave. I think that's just not in the American spirit. And so we should look at ourselves critically and see what we love about some of these founding fathers and what we find deplorable or sadly lacking... The more you learn about anything, whether you're trying to learn the guitar or you're trying to study history, the more you realize you don't know and the more humbling it is. The more you learn about the founding fathers and about the start of our country, the more nuanced things can seem and the more you can question a lot of our mistakes. But I say go ahead and question them. It doesn't mean you can't love this experiment. It is an experiment. We can never forget that it's an experiment and we have to be honest with ourselves about our past. It doesn't mean we have to renounce the whole thing, but we just need to be honest about it.

verbatim transcript · starts at 7:02

Transcript · around this moment

6:42the time to reflect on Washington, Franklin, Hamilton, Jefferson, Look at them, warts and all. And I thought it was a brilliant series. I really loved it. So uh a good a tonic a tonic for all. It's so great to have you back on the show. This is the kind of this is the kind of commentary we want. No, but also the I will say that I admire uh any

7:05country or or populace that is self-critical. That is one of my favorite qualities. Um and I do think there's a notion sometimes these days in the United States and we've had it before in the late 60s and early 70s that to love America you have to love everything about it and if you have any qualms at all you should leave. I I think that's just not in the American

7:29spirit. And so we should look at ourselves uh critically and see what we love about some of these founding fathers and what we find deplorable or sadly uh you know lacking. Well, because the sense that I have uh obviously as a non-American is that um the founding fathers I mean in the case of Washington and Jefferson are literally etched on a mountain and are going to stay there for

7:547 million years. that these are such giants and they played such a crucial role in establishing the American Republic and establishing American ideals that for almost two centuries perhaps it was considered the wrong thing to do even to to contemplate the fact that they might occasionally have toes of clay but that that has changed recently so much so that in fact there's a kind of culture war isn't there that

8:18that on the extremes there are those who say you should never say anything negative about the founding fathers at all and on the other extreme they're kind of genocidal slave owners who should be completely cancelled. To what extent are those extremes polarizing the kind of more centrist opinion in America? >> Well, first of all, I have noticed that um we just marked the 250th and it's it's ongoing, but um I was I believe I

8:44was 12 or 13 the bsentennial. We had the bsentennial in this country as led by the great Gerald Ford. And I remember that very clearly. There was a mania. Um it was sort of just it felt very much like kind of an undiluted joy about the bicesentennial. You know, the the tall ships came into Boston. I believe the queen visited. I mean, it was just everyone I think felt unified and good

9:13about it. Uh now we have the 250th and there is something interesting that's happening which is some people I think felt that the Trump and the administration kind of grabbed the 250th and made it more about their movement which meant that people maybe who weren't part of that felt left out or felt like they didn't want to participate. We're in a moment right now. We're clearly in a moment in this

9:43country and I think it's very hard for some people maybe to just say um I'm really excited about our 250th uh when our current state is so divided. So yeah, it's a little it's a little strange I think at the moment. And do you think that um the fact that there are people say on the left who will say they should all be cancelled, they were all slave owners, they deserve to be

Around this claim
This moment responds to
supportsThe more you learn about the founding fathers, the more nuanced your view becomes — and that's a good thing; the American experiment requires honest self-criticism, not blind adoration.Conan O'Brien · The Rest Is Historygives exampleThomas Jefferson knew slavery was wrong — he wrote a condemnation of it into his original draft of the Declaration of Independence that Southerners forced him to remove — yet he perpetuated it to maintain Monticello, creating the defining moral contradiction of the founding.Conan O'Brien · The Rest Is HistorysupportsStatues should be made of durable soap that dissolves after 60 years, forcing each generation to actively decide whether to re-erect them — acknowledging that we can hold both admiration for historical figures' greatness and condemnation of their failings.Conan O'Brien · The Rest Is HistoryextendsStatues should be made of durable soap that dissolves after 60 years, forcing each generation to actively decide whether to re-erect them — acknowledging that we can hold both admiration for historical figures' greatness and condemnation of their failings.Conan O'Brien · The Rest Is Historygives exampleGeorge Washington's dullness was a political asset — his boring, inscrutable nature meant he rarely said the wrong thing, and he was the indispensable man who kept the revolutionary army together.Conan O'Brien · The Rest Is Historygives exampleBenjamin Franklin's greatest contribution to the American Revolution was his diplomacy — he secured French support, which was decisive for American victory, and his decision to side with the colonists was harder because he had spent so much of his life in London.Conan O'Brien · The Rest Is History