Warfare will always require some human involvement at some point, but you should never send a human into danger if a robot can do it instead — the real value of autonomy is that it unlocks speed and scale, not just task replacement.
Dino argues autonomy's core benefit isn't just removing humans from danger, but enabling ship-building and operations at a speed and scale impossible with traditional crewed platforms. ✦ AI generated
Dino Mavrookas · a16z Podcast · 2026-05-19 · original ↗
starts at this moment · 0:50
“How have you translated this alignment between Saronic's autonomy and the Navy's no man left behind ethos into contracts? And how do autonomy breakthroughs actually allow you to build more faster products for the Navy?”
warfare will require humans involvement at some point but I've seen it and you should never send a human if you have the ability to send a robot. You just shouldn't do it. So let's leverage robotics and protect human life where we can. The real unlock to autonomy is speed and scale.
verbatim transcript · starts at 0:50
0:50contracts? And and how does how do autonomy breakthroughs actually allow you to build more faster products for the Navy? >> So that's One, I'll I'll come back to what autonomy enables is and I'm a I'm a huge believer in this. We're unlocking capability that didn't exist before. Look, warfare will require humans involvement at some point but I've seen it and you should never send a human if you have the ability to
1:19send a robot. You just shouldn't do it. So let's leverage robotics and protect human life where we can. The real unlock to autonomy is speed and scale. Right? If I was sitting up here telling the secretary how we're going to build the same ships that we've been building for the last 50 years or the same ships that they're building in China, we're just going to do it better, faster and
1:46cheaper. I mean, he should just politely ask me to leave. You have to bend the economic cost curve. You have to build ships cheaper. You have to build ships faster. The only two levers you have to pull are material costs and labor costs. We're not going to buy steel cheaper than they're buying it in China. So, you have to take a first principles design to the ship and
2:10just fundamentally use less steel. How do you do that? You build for software autonomy and digitization. Same thing on labor hours. We're not going to acquire a per hour labor rate cheaper than they're paying in China. So, let's build ships much faster. For example, Marada's using is about a 50,000 labor hour on our first ship. Just for order of magnitude, put it in frame of reference. Apples and oranges comparison here. I'm
2:40going to acknowledge that up front. But a destroyer is 7 to 9 million >> Wow. >> labor hours. So, that's the scale and speed that autonomy unlocks because you can redesign the whole platform and make it much simpler to build. And then you build the Then you have the capability at the scale that you need to keep as many people as possible out of combat scenarios. >> You
- ·Warfare will always need some human involvement.
- ·But if a robot can do it, don't send a human.
- ·The imperative is to protect human life via robotics.
- ·Autonomy's real value is speed and scale, not just replacement.
- ·Crewed platforms inherently limit production tempo.
- ·Autonomy enables ship-building at impossible rates.
- ·Operations scale faster without human-rating constraints.
- ·Dino: the 'real unlock' is what robots make possible.