ATRIUMsearch → argument graph
ClaimVideo · 1:19 — 2:49

Robots should be sent into danger instead of humans whenever that capability exists, and warfare will still require human involvement at some point, but autonomy should be leveraged to keep people out of harm's way wherever possible.

Dino frames autonomy's core value as a moral imperative: never risk a human life on a mission a robot can perform, using robotics to protect people while acknowledging warfare will still need humans at some point. ✦ AI generated

Dino Mavrookas · a16z Podcast · 2026-05-19 · original ↗

starts at this moment · 1:19

Elicited by

How have you translated this alignment between Saronic's autonomy and the Navy's no man left behind ethos into contracts? And how do autonomy breakthroughs actually allow you to build more faster products for the Navy?

Warfare will require humans involvement at some point but I've seen it and you should never send a human if you have the ability to send a robot. You just shouldn't do it. So let's leverage robotics and protect human life where we can.

verbatim transcript · starts at 1:19

Transcript · around this moment

1:19send a robot. You just shouldn't do it. So let's leverage robotics and protect human life where we can. The real unlock to autonomy is speed and scale. Right? If I was sitting up here telling the secretary how we're going to build the same ships that we've been building for the last 50 years or the same ships that they're building in China, we're just going to do it better, faster and

1:46cheaper. I mean, he should just politely ask me to leave. You have to bend the economic cost curve. You have to build ships cheaper. You have to build ships faster. The only two levers you have to pull are material costs and labor costs. We're not going to buy steel cheaper than they're buying it in China. So, you have to take a first principles design to the ship and

2:10just fundamentally use less steel. How do you do that? You build for software autonomy and digitization. Same thing on labor hours. We're not going to acquire a per hour labor rate cheaper than they're paying in China. So, let's build ships much faster. For example, Marada's using is about a 50,000 labor hour on our first ship. Just for order of magnitude, put it in frame of reference. Apples and oranges comparison here. I'm

2:40going to acknowledge that up front. But a destroyer is 7 to 9 million >> Wow. >> labor hours. So, that's the scale and speed that autonomy unlocks because you can redesign the whole platform and make it much simpler to build. And then you build the Then you have the capability at the scale that you need to keep as many people as possible out of combat scenarios. >> You

3:06You mentioned the sort of factories and bringing bringing autonomy into the actual manufacturing processes. You've put real money behind rebuilding the American industrial base, most notably a major expansion of your Louisiana shipyard, as well as getting prepared to launch Port Arthur where we're excited We're excited for news there at some point soon. How are you thinking about Saronic investing in some of these forgotten areas forgotten demographics

Related moments