The criminal justice system has three categories of people who deserve a second look: the falsely convicted, those who have shown contrition and rehabilitation, and those with disproportionate sentences.
Loeb explains his framework for criminal justice reform philanthropy, distinguishing between truly dangerous people who should remain incarcerated and three categories of people who deserve a second look — the falsely convicted, the rehabilitated, and the disproportionately sentenced. ✦ AI generated
“Tell us your views on criminal justice, why it hit such a nerve, and then why Ross Ulbricht?”
So criminal justice reform. First of all, there's a lot of bad people in jail. I'm not one of, you know, I think the criminal justice movement has been undermined by folks who see it as an opportunity to not prosecute, not deal with bad people that are out there. But there's also a lot of people that are rehabilitated. Well, there's really three different categories. There's people who are falsely convicted. There are people who have shown contrition and rehabilitation. And there are those who just had a really disproportionate sentence relative to what they did.