ATRIUMsearch → argument graph
ClaimAudio · 24:43 — 26:02

The canonical artifact of knowledge work is shifting from slide decks and spreadsheets to interactive Sites, because HTML sites are infinitely more flexible and higher-bandwidth than traditional office formats.

Akshay describes how internal OpenAI teams—including corporate finance—have replaced monthly slide decks and spreadsheets with Sites. The reason is that Sites are infinitely flexible HTML, so users can do anything they want without hitting the feature boundaries of PowerPoint or Excel. ✦ AI generated

Akshay Nathan · Latent Space · 2026-07-28 · original ↗

plays this moment only · 24:43 — 26:02

Elicited by

There's Excel, there's PowerPoint, there's Docs, the grand trio of work. What other formats of work do you think about? Like you worked on Airtable. Is there a future where there's like OpenAI Airtable?

I was talking to someone the other day who's on our corporate finance team, and we were mentioning how now when they have these reports that they're working on as a team month to month, historically those things were in slide decks and in spreadsheets, and now they're just in Sites. And Sites is the mechanism that they collaborate across the team. And the reason is it's somewhat higher bandwidth. These tools like PowerPoint and Excel are infinitely flexible, but at some point you reach the boundary of either as a human you may not know how to use some feature or something, or the product itself doesn't support it. But with a site you can do anything. You ask for anything and you can get that. Once people see that magic, I think it's been really valuable.

verbatim transcript · starts at 24:43

Transcript · around this moment

Swyx [00:24:46]: Sites

Akshay Nathan [00:24:46]: A core part of this launch. There’s one side of Sites that I think people commonly talk about, especially on Twitter and stuff or X, of like, this like prototyping tool. And like we saw that happen with this launch even. The model slider that you guys were referencing earlier, like that was developed almost fully in a Site. Like, the collaboration between design and engineering and product on that was like on a site where we play with, the affordance and figure out how it feels and all of that. But the other aspect that I think is a little bit less talked about is like Sites as like an artifact for knowledge work. I was talking to someone the other day who’s on like our corporate finance team, and like we were mentioning how like now when they have these reports that they’re, they’re working on as a team month to month, historically those things were in slide decks and in spreadsheets, and now they’re just in Sites. And like Sites is the mechanism that they collaborate across the team. And the reason is ‘cause it’s like, it’s like somewhat higher bandwidth. Like, at these tools like PowerPoint and Excel are like infinitely flexible, but at some point you reach the boundary of like either as a human you may not know how to use some feature or something, or the product itself doesn’t support it. But with a site you can do anything. You ask for anything and you can get that. once people see that magic, I think it’s been really valuable.

Swyx [00:26:02]: Yeah, let me show you my case study. this involves all the hot topics including ChatGPT Work, but also GPT-5.6 token billionaires and token maxing and Sites and auto research. I’m a fan of this game called Strata. It’s, it’s like a little board game that you

Sites, Auto Research, and Research Dashboards

Around this claim