FactArticle
IFP has published 23 actionable 'low-regret' policy recommendations across 7 categories to help policymakers begin addressing the risks of further automating AI R&D, giving countries more options to manage increasingly powerful AI systems.
Think tank IFP published 23 policy ideas across 7 categories aimed at helping policymakers address risks of automated AI R&D, giving countries more leverage over the development of powerful systems. ✦ AI generated
Jack Clark · Import AI · 2026-08-10 · original ↗
Policy experts with think tank IFP have published a set of ideas meant to help 'policymakers begin addressing the risks of further automating AI R&D'. The recommendations involve 23 specific ideas falling across 7 specific categories. If adopted, these recommendations would also give countries, especially the United States, more moves they can make on the gameboard as powerful systems are developed.
Read full article ↗excerpt · fair-use quotation
Around this claim
This moment responds to
supports → To slow or pause powerful AI development we need regimes for sharing information transparently from companies, plus tools for verifying that shared information and firms' slowdown actions are legitimate, paralleling nuclear arms control.Jack Clark · Import AIsupports → The world's leading AI companies ask the US government to support an international effort to deliberately pace the frontier of automated AI development, because capability growth may outrun our ability to control resulting systems.Statement signatories (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google DeepMind, Thinking Machines, Meta, SSI) · Import AI