ATRIUMsearch → argument graph
Audio · 2024-03-03 · 56m · 11 moments

TIP612: Investing In Fear: Profiting From Maximum Pessimism w/ Lauren Templeton

Kyle talks to Lauren Templeton about the many investing and life lessons she learned from investing legend Sir John Templeton, how she sets up her daily life to stay disciplined and avoid biases, how to utilize the scientific method for investing purposes, how we can use lessons from history to improve our decision making today, the importance of utilizing multiple evaluation tools to find great investments, sectors that are facing maximal pessimism today that might be the winners of tomorrow, a ✦ AI generated

timeline · colored by role

01
Mechanism

Saving is both a defensive move to stay in the game and an offensive move to take advantage of opportunities that are coming.

Lauren explains that Sir John Templeton saved 50% of his income not just to avoid financial ruin but to have capital ready for maximal pessimism opportunities.

transcript

Lauren Templeton: Uncle John's strategy of saving and thrift was both a defensive move and an offensive move. So on the defensive side, he didn't want to get taken out of the game. He wanted to stay in the game. He'd seen his dad go through that. He wanted to live to see another day. That was the defensive nature. It was also very offensive. So one time my mother asked him, why do you save so much? Why do you save 50% of everything you make? And he said, well, I save to take advantage of the opportunities that I know are coming.

02
Mechanism

Thrift and saving serve both a defensive purpose (staying in the game) and an offensive purpose (having capital to deploy during crises).

Lauren explains that Sir John Templeton's extreme thrift was motivated by witnessing his father's financial instability and living through the Great Depression. Saving 50% of income was defensive — to never be taken out of the game — and offensive — to have capital ready for maximum pessimism opportunities.

transcript

Lauren Templeton: Uncle John's strategy of saving and thrift was both a defensive move and an offensive move. So on the defensive side, he didn't want to get taken out of the game. He wanted to stay in the game. He'd seen his dad go through that. He wanted to live to see another day. That was the defensive nature. It was also very offensive. So one time my mother asked him, why do you save so much? Why do you save 50% of everything you make? And he said, well, I save to take advantage of the opportunities that I know are coming. So he was very well known for taking advantage of bouts of maximum pessimism in the market. So these were big crisis events, whether that would be in a particular country, a stock, an industry, but he was well known for taking advantage of those events. And he looked forward to them. He saved his money to put to work during those opportunities. He saw them as a golden opportunity.

provides context · 1

03
Example

Sir John Templeton pioneered international investing by seeing in Japan what he saw in America — the same industrious nature, work ethic, and high savings rate — and he did the hard research nobody else would do.

Lauren describes how Templeton invested in Japan in the 1950s and 60s when it was dismissed as an industrial backwater, identifying an accounting anomaly with unconsolidated subsidiaries that made earnings power greatly underestimated.

transcript

Lauren Templeton: So a good example of this was his investment into Japan in the 1950s and 60s. So Japan had really been dismissed as sort of industrial backwater. These were the exporters of trinkets to America. There was a lot of prejudice and hard feelings towards Japan post-World War II. But what he saw in Japan was what he saw in America... growing up and as a young person, he saw the industrious nature of the Japanese, the hard work, the work ethic, the high savings rate, all of these things... He identified an accounting anomaly in Japanese stocks and that they were not accounting for all of the assets on their balance sheet. They were unconsolidated. They were not consolidating their subsidiaries. The earnings power of these companies was greatly underestimated. And to think about the amount of work that he had to do in the 1950s to make it through all of that, to identify the accounting anomalies, to travel to Japan, to meet with management, to analyze these companies, today it's still difficult. It really is amazing every time I hear that and I think about what he did 70 years ago before anybody else was doing it.

04
Example

Sir John Templeton pioneered international investing by doing vastly more research than peers — traveling to Japan in the 1950s, identifying unconsolidated subsidiary accounting anomalies, and exploiting the massive unpopularity of Japanese stocks post-WWII.

Lauren describes how Sir John Templeton invested in Japan in the 1950s and 60s when no one else would. He traveled to Japan, established relationships with brokers, and identified an accounting anomaly where Japanese companies were not consolidating subsidiaries, greatly underestimating earnings power. He wanted the largest universe of stocks possible and applied the 'doctrine of the extra ounce.'

transcript

Lauren Templeton: Japan had really been dismissed as sort of industrial backwater. These were the exporters of trinkets to America. There was a lot of prejudice and hard feelings towards Japan post-World War II. But what he saw in Japan was what he saw in America growing up and as a young person, he saw the industrious nature of the Japanese, the hard work, the work ethic, the high savings rate, all of these things. And he wanted to see that repeated in his investment. ... He did pioneer international investing. He always said to me he wanted his universe of stocks to select from to be as large as possible. ... He identified an accounting anomaly in Japanese stocks and that they were not accounting for all of the assets on their balance sheet. They were unconsolidated. They were not consolidating their subsidiaries. The earnings power of these companies was greatly underestimated. And to think about the amount of work that he had to do in the 1950s to make it through all of that, to identify the accounting anomalies, to travel to Japan, to meet with management, to analyze these companies, today it's still difficult.

gives example · 2

05
Claim

The right question for finding mispricings is not 'where is the outlook greatest?' but 'where is the outlook most miserable?', and the time of maximum pessimism is the best time to buy.

Lauren explains Templeton's core maxim — 'bull markets are born on pessimism, grow on skepticism, mature on optimism and die on euphoria' — and how he systematically looked for maximal pessimism, knowing he'd be wrong about 40% of individual picks but the winners would go up exponentially.

transcript

Lauren Templeton: I think sometimes listeners are confused when you hear this term maximum pessimism. So I think it's helpful to just state his quote, which was, 'Bull markets are born on pessimism, grow on skepticism, mature on optimism and die on euphoria. The time of maximum pessimism is the best time to buy and the time of maximum optimism is the best time to sell.' So when he said that investors are always asking the wrong question, the right question is where is the outlook most miserable, that was his question to identify where to find the mispricings... He also understood that some of his investments would not work out. So he thought he was correct about 60% of the time. And he also knew that he would more than likely end up in some value traps using these deeply discounted methodologies. However, he thought the rest of the portfolio would go up exponentially. And that's how he thought about it.

gives example · 1provides context · 1

06
Claim

Maximum pessimism investing is not simply buying statistically cheap stocks — it requires quality, systematic application, and accepting 40% of investments will be value traps while the rest go up exponentially.

Lauren clarifies that Sir John Templeton was not just buying statistically cheap stocks — he liked quality but didn't want to pay for it. He understood he would be correct about 60% of the time and accepted value traps, expecting the winners to go up exponentially. His approach was systematic, using over 100 different valuation metrics adapted to market conditions, like a tennis player with many shots.

transcript

Lauren Templeton: He wasn't simply looking for stocks that were statistically cheap. He really liked quality, but he didn't really want to pay for it. So he also understood that some of his investments would not work out. So he thought he was correct about 60% of the time. And he also knew that he would more than likely end up in some value traps using these deeply discounted methodologies. However, he thought the rest of the portfolio would go up exponentially. ... I think of John Templeton as the Roger Federer of investing. ... Roger Federer has a great forehand, but he's also got a great backhand. And he's also got a good drop shot. And he can really run the court because he has all of these different tools in his box. And that's how Uncle John was. His core philosophy stayed the same, but he was always looking at different metrics and evaluating different metrics that might improve his probability of success. And he realized that certain metrics work better during certain time periods.

07
Mechanism

Templeton used the scientific method in investing by constantly trying new strategies aligned with his core principles, testing them, and shutting them down quickly if they didn't work.

Lauren describes how Templeton would test strategies like the IPO lockup short, closed-end fund discounts, and pre-ADR investing — always within his value/contrarian framework — and would abandon them without hesitation if they failed.

transcript

Lauren Templeton: John Templeton believed deeply in the scientific method. And the way I think he used it when it came to investing is really just in trying new strategies... So let me give you an example. He's well known for running the IPO lockup strategy during the tech bubble in the late 90s, early 2000s. That strategy, he would short stock seven days before the IPO lockup expiration, he would cover 10 days later. That strategy is aligned with his core principles that he believed in, but it was a different way to play it... Another strategy that I saw him use effectively was buying closed-end mutual funds, not levered closed-end mutual funds, trading at a 30% discount to NAV during a market sell-off... I was often receiving faxes or letters from him about some research project he had read about somewhere... The strategy didn't work because we couldn't get locates on the shorts. So we were having to put on all the shorts synthetically and that's quite expensive and the expenses ate into the return. So it was not a successful strategy. He shut it down and moved on.

gives example · 1

08
Mechanism

Sir John Templeton applied the scientific method to investing by constantly tinkering with new strategies — always within his core philosophy — testing anomalies, shutting down what didn't work, and moving on.

Lauren explains how Sir John Templeton used the scientific method in investing by constantly testing new strategies that aligned with his core principles — like the IPO lockup short strategy, buying closed-end funds at discount during sell-offs, or investing ahead of ADR listings. He would test, fail fast, and move on, never straying from his core value philosophy.

transcript

Lauren Templeton: John Templeton believed deeply in the scientific method. And the way I think he used it when it came to investing is really just in trying new strategies. When I say new strategies, he did not ever stray from his core principles or the investment philosophy that he believed in. But he was always trying new strategies. So let me give you an example. He's well known for running the IPO lockup strategy during the tech bubble in the late 90s, early 2000s. That strategy, he would short stock seven days before the IPO lockup expiration, he would cover 10 days later. That strategy is aligned with his core principles that he believed in, but it was a different way to play it. ... He had a set of core principles, and that's how he viewed the investment world and landscape. There were lots of different manifestations of that as far as strategies that he would pursue in different market environments, but they were always very aligned with those core principles.

09
Claim

Physical and psychological distance from the financial crowd is a crucial investing advantage — it removes reactivity, FOMO pressure, and enables independent long-term thinking.

Lauren explains that Sir John Templeton's move to the Bahamas was advantageous because it removed him from the financial centers — no sales calls, no groupthink lunches, no reacting to news. Getting the Wall Street Journal late reinforced non-reactivity. She frames this as 'better behavior' being one of three sources of alpha, and notes that resisting FOMO during euphoric markets is even harder than buying during panic.

transcript

Lauren Templeton: If you're in the Bahamas and you're not in one of the big financial centers, especially when he moved to the Bahamas in the 1960s. You're so removed. You're not taking the same meetings. You're not taking the same sales calls. You're not going to the same lunches everyone else is. ... You're having a completely independent experience. It's a slower life. You can focus on reading and making good long-term decisions. And when he said my performance was better because I received the Wall Street Journal a few days later, I do think he was talking about not reacting, but just removing yourself even physically from the crowd can be so important. ... And to us as a firm, we think there are three sources of alpha, better information, better model or process, or better behavior. And our focus is on better behavior. ... The other part of distancing yourself from the crowd and why it is maybe important to not live where everybody else lives and think independently is the FOMO part, the fear of missing out. So when everybody around you is making money at absurd valuations and stocks, it's really hard. I think that's the harder part.

gives example · 1

10
Claim

Physically and psychologically distancing yourself from the crowd is the hardest part of investing — harder than buying during fear — because of the FOMO when everyone else is making money at absurd valuations.

Lauren explains that while value investors focus on buying during maximal pessimism, the harder challenge is resisting FOMO during euphoric markets, and notes that Templeton's physical move to the Bahamas helped him achieve that independence.

transcript

Lauren Templeton: When people think about value investing, they think about going into these moments of maximum pessimism. How do you have the conviction to put capital to work when the markets are really scary? And that is one part of it. But the other part of distancing yourself from the crowd and why it is maybe important to not live where everybody else lives and think independently is the FOMO part, the fear of missing out. So when everybody around you is making money at absurd valuations and stocks, it's really hard. I think that's the harder part. How do you distance yourself from the crowd and sit there and be patient when it feels like physical punishment to do so, when everybody else around you is making money? That is definitely more challenging. And I think perhaps there is some wisdom in physically distancing yourself from the crowd during those scenarios.

gives example · 1

11
Example

Inversion — reverse engineering DCFs to see what the market price implies — was the key mental model used successfully during the 2008-09 financial crisis to identify buying opportunities.

Lauren describes how Templeton and Phillips Capital used Charlie Munger's inversion mental model during the Great Financial Crisis. They reverse engineered DCFs to see what share prices implied about future fundamentals, finding that prices forecast zero to negative growth. The reframed question became: 'Do I really believe this company is never going to grow again?' — which revealed the buying opportunity.

transcript

Lauren Templeton: During the great financial crisis, we were really looking at share prices and solving for 10 years of fundamentals. And we were seeing that share prices were forecasting zero to negative growth in trough margins in a lot of the stocks we were looking at. So the way you would reverse engineer that is after you've gone through that process and reverse engineered the DCF, you would ask yourself the question and reframe the argument, do I really believe this company is never going to grow again? So that is the way inversion would work for us.

Highlight slides
Templeton's Dual-Strategy Saving✦ from: Saving is both a defensive move to stay in the game and an offensive move to take advantage of opportunities that are coming.The Offensive Side of Thrift✦ from: Saving is both a defensive move to stay in the game and an offensive move to take advantage of opportunities that are coming.Templeton's Two-Sided Saving Strategy✦ from: Thrift and saving serve both a defensive purpose (staying in the game) and an offensive purpose (having capital to deploy during crises).Defensive Motive: Stay in the Game✦ from: Thrift and saving serve both a defensive purpose (staying in the game) and an offensive purpose (having capital to deploy during crises).Offensive Motive: Deploy During Maximum Pessimism✦ from: Thrift and saving serve both a defensive purpose (staying in the game) and an offensive purpose (having capital to deploy during crises).Seeing Japan as Postwar America✦ from: Sir John Templeton pioneered international investing by seeing in Japan what he saw in America — the same industrious nature, work ethic, and high savings rate — and he did the hard research nobody else would do.Accounting Anomaly Found via Hard Work✦ from: Sir John Templeton pioneered international investing by seeing in Japan what he saw in America — the same industrious nature, work ethic, and high savings rate — and he did the hard research nobody else would do.Templeton's Maximum Pessimism: Quality + System + Asymmetric Returns✦ from: Maximum pessimism investing is not simply buying statistically cheap stocks — it requires quality, systematic application, and accepting 40% of investments will be value traps while the rest go up exponentially.
Related episodes