Article · 2026-07-19 · 4 moments

AI Mania Is Eviscerating Global Decision-Making

AI Mania Is Eviscerating Global Decision-Making Here's an entertaining perspective from Nik Suresh on the AI mania that is overwhelming the large companies that he consults with. It's crammed with spicy anecdotes from anonymous sources. In one extreme case, I have seen an executive confess that they had never even used ChatGPT or any AI tool in their life, immediately after producing a technical strategy for an organisation with $2B+ in revenue which was entirely centered around AI. Here's a ✦ AI generated

Read original ↗

GUEST Nik Suresh GUEST anonymous engineer HOST Simon Willison

Claim◆

AI mania has become so intense inside large companies that it is corrupting their decision-making — executives now build entire multi-billion-dollar strategies around AI while having no personal understanding of the technology, and honest technical assessment is being suppressed by social and commercial pressure.

Nik Suresh argues that AI hype has overwhelmed large companies to the point that it is actively damaging honest, rational decision-making rather than improving it.

transcript

Nik Suresh: Here's an entertaining perspective from Nik Suresh on the AI mania that is overwhelming the large companies that he consults with. It's crammed with spicy anecdotes from anonymous sources.

gives example · 2

Anecdote◆

An executive who had never personally used ChatGPT or any AI tool nonetheless produced a technical strategy document for a $2B+ revenue organization that was built entirely around AI.

A striking anecdote: an executive with zero personal AI usage authored a company-wide AI strategy for a multi-billion-dollar organization.

transcript

Nik Suresh: I have seen an executive confess that they had never even used ChatGPT or any AI tool in their life, immediately after producing a technical strategy for an organisation with $2B+ in revenue which was entirely centered around AI.

Anecdote

At a company that ranks employees on an AI-usage leaderboard, an engineer secretly checked out a parallel copy of the Go repository and had an AI rewrite the entire codebase in Zig on the side, purely to generate visible AI-usage metrics and protect their job.

An engineer describes gaming an internal AI-usage leaderboard by having an AI needlessly rewrite an entire codebase in a different language just to appear sufficiently AI-driven.

transcript

anonymous engineer: Checking out a parallel copy of our Go repository and telling the AI to rewrite the whole thing in Zig while I work on something else just so I can keep my job.

gives example · 2

Mechanism◆

Vendor executives stay quiet about implausible AI productivity claims (like 100x gains) not primarily because of sales dishonesty, but because contradicting a customer executive's absurd claims would be seen as an attack, undermine that customer's credibility, risk enterprise contract cancellation, and ultimately get the vendor executive fired.

Suresh recounts a vendor executive explaining that unrealistic AI productivity claims go unchallenged mainly because disputing a customer's exaggerations threatens the business relationship and the dissenter's own job, not just because of sales spin.

transcript

Nik Suresh: Executives at their customers were saying absurd things about achieving 100x productivity, and this meant that if any executive at the vendor said that these gains were not plausible, it would undermine the credibility of the customer's executive, be perceived as an attack (or heresy), and possibly result in an enterprise contract cancellation.

Highlight slides

The Executive Who Never Used AI✦ from: An executive who had never personally used ChatGPT or any AI tool nonetheless produced a technical strategy document for a $2B+ revenue organization that was built entirely around AI.Why Vendors Stay Silent on Absurd AI Claims✦ from: Vendor executives stay quiet about implausible AI productivity claims (like 100x gains) not primarily because of sales dishonesty, but because contradicting a customer executive's absurd claims would be seen as an attack, undermine that customer's credibility, risk enterprise contract cancellation, and ultimately get the vendor executive fired.AI Mania Is Corrupting Corporate Decisions✦ from: AI mania has become so intense inside large companies that it is corrupting their decision-making — executives now build entire multi-billion-dollar strategies around AI while having no personal understanding of the technology, and honest technical assessment is being suppressed by social and commercial pressure.A Credibility Gap✦ from: An executive who had never personally used ChatGPT or any AI tool nonetheless produced a technical strategy document for a $2B+ revenue organization that was built entirely around AI.The Real Incentive Structure✦ from: Vendor executives stay quiet about implausible AI productivity claims (like 100x gains) not primarily because of sales dishonesty, but because contradicting a customer executive's absurd claims would be seen as an attack, undermine that customer's credibility, risk enterprise contract cancellation, and ultimately get the vendor executive fired.Nik Suresh's Inside View✦ from: AI mania has become so intense inside large companies that it is corrupting their decision-making — executives now build entire multi-billion-dollar strategies around AI while having no personal understanding of the technology, and honest technical assessment is being suppressed by social and commercial pressure.

Related episodes

Video · 20VC

Wix Founder: Will Base44 Win the Vibe-Coding Wars? | The Truth About the Economics of Vibe-Coding

→

Audio · All-In Podcast

The IPO Comeback: Why Tech Giants Are Finally Going Public | All-In Liquidity IPO Panel

→

Video · Lenny's Podcast

The rise of taste, human authenticity and judgment in an AI world | Adam Mosseri (Head of IG)

→