Software historically just digitized filing cabinets — it stored information but didn't do the work, so the world didn't get that much more efficient.
Alex argues that traditional software merely took paper-based filing cabinets and made them digital, but people still had to perform the actual work. The result was that efficiency barely improved — the same number of people were still needed.
transcript
Alex Rampell (a16z): I would actually argue that the world didn't get that much more efficient with software because all that software did was like take HR like did Peopleoft and then workday make HR efficient make make HR departments more efficient like I don't think so because the same number of people worked in HR for the exact same size company in like 1950 as probably 2000 and instead of using filing cabinets that are you know that are guarded by Stein and Frederick you know making sure that nobody breaks into the HR files. Now you have an IT department and a CISO to make sure nobody hacks into the IT files or the you know the HR filing cabinet. So nothing really got more efficient.
extends · 1