Zuckerberg's essay ignores the fundamental question of whether systems capable of superhuman invention will actually serve individual empowerment rather than fundamentally altering the balance of power.
The author argues that Zuckerberg's vision of proliferating AI to empower individuals fails to address whether truly capable invention systems would actually work on behalf of less capable humans. ✦ AI generated
The missing question: The part of this essay I understand the least is Zuckerberg's co-mingling of AI systems capable of invention with individual empowerment... Surely this is the key question? I am not suggesting that superhuman invention guarantees some kind of malign entity that is independent from people. Rather I am suggesting that it's hard to reconcile a system capable of superhuman invention with something that doesn't fundamentally alter the balance of power in the world in ways that are confusing and hard to reason about.