Claim◆Article
The most important evolution in AI over the past year is the shift from conversational chat to agentic systems that can autonomously perform hours of human work.
The article traces how Ethan Mollick's guide to AI has shifted from recommending chat-based models a year ago to now emphasizing agentic systems that can do the equivalent of hours of human work autonomously. ✦ AI generated
Author · Simon Willison's Weblog · 2026-07-27 · original ↗
A year ago it was still all about chat - ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini - with o3, Claude 4 Opus, and Gemini 2.5 Pro as the models and Deep Research as a useful alternative mode. Today it's much more about agentic systems - 'where the AI is capable of doing the equivalent of many hours of real human work in one go'.
Read full article ↗excerpt · fair-use quotation
- ·Most important AI evolution: chat → agentic systems
- ·Agentic systems autonomously do hours of human work
- ·Mollick's guide shifted focus over the past year
- ·A year ago: all about chat — ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini
- ·Models were o3, Claude 4 Opus, Gemini 2.5 Pro
- ·Today: agentic systems capable of multi-hour autonomous work
- ·Deep Research was the only agentic mode a year ago
- ·Now agentic capability is the primary emphasis
- ·Equivalent of 'many hours of real human work in one go'
Around this claim
This moment responds to
supports → The most important shift in AI tool usage over the past year has been from conversational chat interfaces to agentic systems that can perform many hours of human work autonomously.Author · Simon Willison's Weblogprovides context → Google's Gemini has fallen out of the recommended AI tools because the company still lacks a clear agentic computing product comparable to Codex, ChatGPT Work, or Cowork.Author · Simon Willison's Weblogprovides context → Gemini has fallen off Ethan Mollick's list of recommended AI tools because Google lacks a clear product in the agentic coding and computer-use category.Author · Simon Willison's Weblogprovides context → The naming of AI agent modes across ChatGPT and Claude is confusing and inconsistent, with Work, Codex, Cowork, and Code not mapping cleanly between platforms.Ethan Mollick · Simon Willison's Weblogextends → Giving AI access to your computer is the most powerful way to use it, but the naming conventions for the agentic modes across ChatGPT (Work, Codex) and Claude (Cowork, Code) are confusingly inconsistent and do not map onto each other.Author · Simon Willison's Weblogextends → The naming of AI agent modes across ChatGPT and Claude is confusing and inconsistent, with Work, Codex, Cowork, and Code not mapping cleanly between platforms.Ethan Mollick · Simon Willison's Weblogprovides context → Giving AI access to your computer is the most powerful way to use it, but the naming conventions for the agentic modes across ChatGPT (Work, Codex) and Claude (Cowork, Code) are confusingly inconsistent and do not map onto each other.Author · Simon Willison's Weblogprovides context → The difference between ChatGPT Work on mobile versus on desktop is spectacularly unintuitive — on mobile, switching from Chat to Work mode gives the Code Interpreter unrestricted internet access, while on desktop the same mode is effectively a skin on top of Codex.Author · Simon Willison's Weblogprovides context → The difference between ChatGPT Work on mobile versus the desktop app is spectacularly unintuitive — mobile Work mode simply grants the Code Interpreter unrestricted internet access rather than providing agentic capabilities.Author · Simon Willison's Weblog