Putting CUDA on GeForce was an existential strategic decision that crushed NVIDIA's gross margins and market cap, but it was necessary to build the install base that made the computing platform successful.
Jensen explains how the decision to embed CUDA into GeForce GPUs — at immense cost — was the pivotal bet that built the developer install base, despite cratering the company's market cap from ~$8B to $1.5B. ✦ AI generated
Jensen Huang · Lex Fridman · 2026-03-23 · original ↗
starts at this moment · 14:40
“Can you take me through that decision? So, putting CUDA on GeForce, could not afford to do? Can you explain that decision? Why, why boldly choose to do that anyway? Can you explain that decision?”
CUDA increased our cost of that GPU, which is a consumer product, so tremendously, it completely consumed all of the company's gross profit dollars. After we launched CUDA, I recognized that it was going to add so much cost, but it was something we believed in. Our market cap went down to like one and a half billion dollars. We were down there for a while and we clawed our way way back slowly, but we carried CUDA on GeForce.
verbatim transcript · starts at 14:40
14:40After we launched CUDA, I recognized that it was going to add so much cost, but it was something we believed in. You know, our market cap went down to like one and a half billion dollars. And so we were down, we were down there for a while and we clawed our way way back slowly, but we carried CUDA on GeForce. I always say that NVIDIA is the house that
15:05GeForce built, because it was GeForce that took CUDA out to everybody. Researchers, scientists, they discovered CUDA on GeForce because they were all, you know... Many of 'em were gamers. Many of them built their own PCs anyways. In a university lab, many of them built clusters themselves, you know, using PC components. And, and so that, you know, that's kind of how we got going. - And then that became the platform and the foundation for the deep learning revolution.
15:35- That was also another great, great observation. Yeah. - That existential moment, do you remember... Like, what were those meetings like? What were those discussions like, deciding as a company, risking everything? - Well I had to make it clear to the board what we're trying to do, and the management team knew our gross margins were gonna get crushed. So you could imagine a world where GeForce would carry
16:04the burden of CUDA and none of the gamers would appreciate it and none of the gamers would pay for it. You know, they only pay certain price and it doesn't matter what your cost is. And so the... You know, we, we increased our cost by 50% and that con- consumed... And we were a 35% gross margin company, and so it, it was a... It was quite a difficult decision to make. But
16:28you could imagine that someday this would go into workstations and it would go into supercomputers and, and in those segments, maybe we can capture more margin. so you could, you could reason your way into being able to afford this, But it still took... It took a decade. - But that, but that's more of, like, conversation with the board convincing them, but you psychologically- ... as NVIDIA's continued to make bold bets
- ·CUDA on GeForce consumed nearly all gross profit dollars
- ·Market cap collapsed from ~$8B to ~$1.5B
- ·Embedding it in consumer GPUs was necessary for developer reach
- ·Recovery was slow but CUDA stayed on GeForce
- ·Pre-CUDA market cap hovered around $8 billion
- ·Post-launch, valuation cratered to ~$1.5 billion
- ·NVIDIA lingered at that low for an extended period before recovering