ContextAudio · 0:00 — 1:30
Italy's collapse of long-standing city-state governments, combined with the unpredictable, non-hereditary turnover of the papacy, created a 'perfect storm' of instability that only a single power with hereditary staying power near Rome could stabilize.
Ada Palmer explains that Machiavelli wrote The Prince against a backdrop of two compounding instabilities: nearly every Italian city-state had recently had its government overthrown, and the papacy's unpredictable, non-hereditary succession meant an unfamiliar, often hostile ruler every decade or so. ✦ AI generated
Ada Palmer · Dwarkesh Podcast · 2026-06-16 · original ↗
plays this moment only · 0:00 — 1:30
Elicited by
“Why were things so bad? What is the historical context in which he’s writing The Prince?”
When Machiavelli was born, there were six or seven city-states in Italy that had had their governments uprooted recently. By the time he’s writing The Prince, it’s dozens, in fact, the majority of these places. So it’s volatile. Almost no government has staying power.
verbatim transcript · starts at 0:00
Transcript · around this moment
0:00– How Florence bargained with Cesare Borgia for survival
0:00– How Florence bargained with Cesare Borgia for survival
Around this claim