In the age of AI, an employee's cost to the company should be a dynamic number based on their model usage efficiency, not a static salary, and performance should be assessed on a 'productivity vs. cost' quadrant.

63:54worried about cost management and uh and freaking out about the amount of inference they're spending and they don't know how to think about it. It's like a whole new way of of like doing business and thinking about your your opex. Like the old way of thinking about how your how much you give your employees, you like give them a salary and you kind of forget about it.

64:16Like someone knows what what everyone's making but like it's a static number that like it's readjusted on on a quarterly basis maybe after performance reviews. Really, your your employees all cost totally dynamic different amounts now and uh I think a lot of like companies are putting it on them to do routing. And I think in the future there's a good chance that it will like get pushed

64:43downwards to the employee level. Your employees should like figure out which tools and models to use that are best for their tasks and then we should figure out how much you're costing be like due to the choices that you make as an employee [snorts] and you know, your your cost as an employee is a going to be a dynamic number and it's going to be, you know, dependent on

65:05how much that employee is like effectively using, you know, expensive and cheap models to do their job. And uh and then I would I I advise companies to kind of like still do their normal management work, like have their managers kind of assess how how effective and productive employees are, but also line it up with how much their employees cost, and then kind of come up with, you know, a quadrant of

65:32of celebration. Like these employees are like doing a good job and they're pretty price effective or cost effective. And then a quadrant of concern, and these employees are kind of maybe doing a so-so job and whoa, they are not cost effective at all. Their AI use their AI psychosis is off the charts. Like and then you address the quadrant of concern. So I don't think people talk

65:52about like basically how you think of like employee cost in the age of AI and that it's it's really it should be a dynamic number and not a a static thing that like only a few people know about and it's gone. >> And wonderful, but can you imagine going to someone, "Oh, I'm sorry, you you were worth 100 grand last month, now you're worth 50." I think it would make

66:12planning >> Well, they they are in control of how much they cost. That's the great thing. Like all employees are in control of how much they cost and and can like influence that. Um it's now now you get to think like, "Okay, how good am I as an employee and how uh efficient am I being as well?" >> Final one, when you look at the landscape today, there are so many

66:37things to be excited about. What do you singularly most excited about? >> One is rare disease research, which I think is one of those things that has been intelligence bottleneck or really just the inference bottleneck. Like it involves like trying out lots of ideas and seeing if they work. Um the other is crowdsourcing productive urban life improvements. So for example, like imagine if somebody had like if someone was curious about finding