Every company in the next 24 months will have a security breach due to an LLM agent, and they've already had it but are not disclosing it.

29:15Moonshot and then it got cheaper. So, we moved to fireworks. You're fired. That was on open airropic. You might or might not get fired. But but you don't because what are you going to do? You you you research it. You you you you you have a postmortem. You add guard rules. You fix it. But when this is a big [ __ ] you fired the CIO for

29:34for that. You you left the moonshot API on and then you moved to fireworks on K3 to save money. That was a bad call. You know what you should have done? Not buy those extra modules at Service Now. We didn't even need those. >> What you're saying at the end is some version of no one gets fired for buying IBM. And you think at the margin no one

29:53will get f like you you think if your fable model runs a mock people will go [ __ ] happens just like data breaches. But you think if your overseas openweight model runs a mock you'll get blamed. That's the fact. >> I believe that every company in the next 24 months will have a security breach due to an LLM agent. every single company and they've already had it and

30:12they're not disclosing it. And as they scale in a level we've never seen before. This isn't just someone that left a flash drive at Scale's office or or or or or dropped the laptop in the subway or even left even left a a GitHub uh open. This is worse and it's happening every day. If it happened to me, it's happening to everybody. We're just not disclosing it. And boy, at