ATRIUMsearch → argument graph
FactArticle

Claude Opus 5 is better at finding vulnerabilities but has deliberately not been trained on how to exploit them, making it substantially behind Mythos 5 on exploitation.

Anthropic intentionally avoided training Opus 5 on cyber tasks, so while it has improved at finding vulnerabilities through general capability gains and comes close to Mythos 5 at detection, it remains substantially behind on exploitation — turning vulnerabilities into material threats. ✦ AI generated

Anthropic (release post) · Simon Willison's Weblog · 2026-07-24 · original ↗

As with its predecessor, Opus 4.8, we've intentionally avoided training Opus 5 on cyber tasks. The model has nevertheless improved substantially on these tasks as a result of becoming more generally capable, and it comes close to Mythos 5 at finding cybersecurity vulnerabilities. However, it remains substantially behind Mythos 5 on the exploitation of those vulnerabilities—that is, in turning vulnerabilities into material cyber threats.

Read full article ↗excerpt · fair-use quotation

Related moments
Claude Opus 5 is better at finding vulnerabilities but has deliberately not been trained on how to exploit them, making it substantially behind Mythos 5 on exploitation. — Atrium