Enterprise platforms are far more cost-effective than trying to replicate their functionality with language models.
McDermott argues that replacing an enterprise platform with a language model is roughly 10x more expensive when you account for rebuild costs, human capital, and GPU/token expenses.
transcript
Bill McDermott: The cost to replace an enterprise platform in this SAS apocalypse that people talk about is an extraordinary expense to try to match what some of these really important enterprise platforms do. Because you'd have to rebuild it. You're getting a model. I'm going to write code now. So I'm rebuilding your model. Let's take that cost. And then let's take the cost associated with the human capital doing that instead of something else, because the platform was doing the work for you. And then let's add up the cost of the GPU factory, the business model associated with the language model company, and the tokens that will materially affect their business model. We've actually done the math on this. And so for a simple application on our platform, it would be 10 times greater in cost to try to replicate it with a language model.