California's vote-counting system is completely unacceptable and a sign of atrophy, taking longer than India's, but there is no evidence of fraud in the late mail-in surge for Nithya Raman.
Nate Silver argues California's election system is accurate but unacceptably slow, and that late mail-in surges favoring Democrats are predictable outcomes of partisan voting patterns, not fraud.
transcript
Nate Silver: So I'd say I think there's no evidence of fraud is the short summary version. The mistake that can be made is to assume that each ballot like comes in independently when there are systematic differences between groups and when they tend to cast their ballots. So Democrats have long been encouraged to vote by mail. Actually, it used to be more of a Republican thing, but like under Trump, who discouraged mail voting in 2016 and 2020 and 2024 to some extent, like that shifted. So look, I think California's system is completely unacceptable. I've done some consulting work on like the Indian election, where you like literally have polling stations in the Himalayas and they actually stagger their elections. But once Election Day happens, they count their vote within 24 hours. I think it's ridiculous and very failed state that California takes longer than that. But if you have one party who systematically tends to vote later, also Democrats in both the LA race and the governorship had more of a choice to make. ... I think the California vote count is an accurate tally of the votes that were cast. ... The prior on Pratt advancing probably would be pretty low potentially. And I wish that people were less partisan. ... These blue shifts or red shifts are somewhat predictable and are going to be an inevitable consequence of having different mechanisms to vote where you have like different cues in a line, right? ... I think the system should be simplified. ... Most countries would count much, much faster than the US. ... The fact that the United States, the technological leader of the world, and the supposed like bickering of democracy can't do that, I think is a sign of atrophy of the efficacy of the system.