ATRIUMsearch → argument graph

first-hand human knowledge

Attention is all that matters.

We read the podcasts, essays and interviews — and hand you the arguments: who claims what, who rebuts, and the original voice one click away.

MechanismArticle

Newer Anthropic models have been specifically trained, presumably via reinforcement learning, to better use the edit tools baked into Claude Code, and this makes them more likely to misuse the differently-shaped custom edit tools of other coding harnesses like Pi.

Armin's theory for the regression: Anthropic has likely RL-trained recent models heavily on Claude Code's own edit tool, which inadvertently degrades their ability to correctly use differently-designed edit tools in third-party harnesses like Pi.

MechanismArticle

Claude Code's much higher token usage compared to Codex comes from its harness re-feeding a large accumulated context history into the model at each turn, not from generating longer outputs.

Investigating why Claude Code burns far more tokens than Codex or Qwen-Code, Raschka found the difference is almost entirely on the input side—one run used 578k input tokens versus just 4.5k output tokens—suggesting Claude's harness re-accumulates prior context every turn.

Sebastian Raschka · Ahead of AI